Q Slots | The Best Rated Online Slot Games

Hey guys, I have a bit of a long DD on ACAC / Playstudios. You can read the text below. If you want to see the full post with all the nice pictures, you can check it out here. I was too lazy to upload each picture individually to Imgur. Apologies in advance.
I've seen numerous people on Reddit compare the ACAC / Playstudios SPAC to Skillz, and some even to Draftkings. I think this is mainly because they're all in the online gaming / gambling industry, but aside from that, the companies themselves are quite different.
I think a more apt comparison should be between Playstudios and Playtika (Ticker: PLTK), since they operate in the same vertical, compete against one another in mobile slots games, and Playtika has publicly available financial data in which I will be making comparisons against.
Playtika Analysis
You can find Playtika's prospectus here
First and foremost, Playtika is one of the leaders in the mobile casino space. They have an assortment of games, and they themselves are diversifying into more casual games (similar to what Playstudios says they are trying to do), but their bread and butter are casino games, and the ones that make the most money for them are slots.
Slotomania, House of Fun, and Caesars Slots are all mobile slots games, and as you can see from the above, they generate a significant portion of Playtika's revenues (roughly 50% of their 2020 revenues).
OK, so why do I keep bringing up Playtika? Well, they had a very interesting graph that shows how much of their revenues come from different segments of their user base, based on when they acquired those users.
What this chart is saying is that 45% of their revenues came from users acquired from 2013 and earlier!
This is insane! They have such high user retention and user LTVs, that they're still monetizing a portion of their users that they acquired from 7 years ago.
If we go up to 2017, then roughly 75% of their revenues come from users acquired 2017 and earlier!
This is important because Playtika's oldest games are all slots games. So this is telling us that users that play mobile slots games, they tend to stay with those games for extremely long periods of time, and if they do stick with them, they spend a lot of money! This is great news since the vast majority of Playstudio's revenues come from mobile slots games.
If you look at Playtika's financials, you'll notice pretty nice revenue growth. However, a lot of that is non-organic, and was accomplished through M&A. This was because in 2016, Playtika was acquired by a consortium of Chinese game companies for $4.4 billion (including Giant Network, a well known gaming company in China), and they need to make revenue numbers higher to have a better story to sell for the IPO.
And part of their strategy was to diversify into casual games, and they did so by acquiring about 15 companies since 2016, including Wooga (developer of June's Journey, a very profitable find hidden objects mobile game) and Supertreat (developer of Solitaire Grand Harvest, a profitable card game).
However, one of the caveats of casual games is that the ARPPU (average revenue per paying user) is lower, and retention is lower than casino games. I did my own calculations on Playtika's ARPPU for 2018, 2019, and 2020, and you can see the noticeable downtrend. This was obviously not disclosed in the prospectus. Only ARPDAU (average revenue per daily active user) was disclosed.
My belief is that even though ARPPU and retention are lower, maybe the market is giving a higher multiple to casual games. I believe that even though online gambling is beginning to see legalization in many states, and more and more people are starting to be open to it, there is still a bit of a social stigma associated with it, and certain investors may be wary to investing in a pure "casino" play. That's why Playtika is making such a concerted effort to move away from purely casino games, and positioning itself as an mobile entertainment company. Another reason is also the immense competition and high user acquisition costs, but Playtika has shown that they are more than able to execute on a long term strategy here.
Playstudios Analysis
Before jumping into anything else, I want to go straight to Playstudio's financials.
The reason is because I think there's a lot of fluff here, and I want people to know the bullshit. But even when you see through the bullshit, the downside is still mitigated enough to warrant this play.
So first off, take any numbers you see from 2022 with a grain of salt. No one knows what's going to happen this year, let alone two years in the future, and in my eyes, those 2022 numbers look extremely unrealistic. Revenue growth will probably not be that high, unless they make some big acquisitions, and EBITDA margin expansion probably won't be that fast.
Revenue Growth
Playstudios is planning on launching a Bingo and an RPG game, and their plan is to aggressively spend on UA (User Acqusition) in 2021. Their hope is that revenues will scale up with their UA, and by 2022, they can lower their UA spend a bit, and continue to monetize the new games exceptionally well, maybe at an even better rate than 2021.
I think this is a bit farfetched, especially in such a competitive space as Bingo. I've done analysis on Bingo games before, and some of those games have also been around for 8 to 10 years, and they can't expect to just launch a game and have it ramped up to their expected revenue in a year's time. Development for those games requires game designers, people who are very good at math, product designers, and a many other people, which can make the development timeline quite long (at least a few months, for a more finished product, I think at least half a year for these guys). I think a more plausible scenario is that they acquire a smaller Bingo player, and then begin optimizing that game, and add in their own loyalty rewards, as that's the quickest way to ramp up revenues post IPO.
My guess is revenues are not going to ramp up as quickly as they expect, and they'll see limited revenue growth here, and still mainly see some growth from better monetizing their slots players. I think by 2022, somewhere between $350 million to $400 million in revenues is more reasonable, and I'd probably lean towards the lower end of that range.
Margin Expansion
In terms of margin expansion, I think the decrease in cost of sales is doable. It seems like there is some extra fat there that they can trim as they scale. The cost of sales is mainly the tax that Apple and Google charges when users make a purchase through their respective stores, and this is a flat 30%. I doubt they'll get it less than 30% any time soon, but that will probably be through getting their whales to make purchases outside of the Google Play Store or App Store, and using a much cheaper payment processor.
I think a long term goal of 20 - 25% for UA spend is reasonable. I'm OK with these numbers, though they may need to spend more initially to ramp up new games. One of the benefits of their loyalty rewards program is that they can have higher retention, and this might be a way for them to lower their UA spend, since people may be more willing to tell their friends about a free trip or prize they won through a mobile game.
Another reason I'm OK with the UA spend is because it seems like they have a pretty knowledgeable UA team. I have access to App Annie, a data analytics company that tracks mobile apps, and I checked out the download history for POP! Slots, one of Playstudio's mobile games.
You'll notice that US downloads spiked quite a bit in March. This is right when COVID-19 was beginning to spike in the US, and people began working from home. In the mobile app world, many apps had spikes in downloads in March and April 2020 because there was a much larger pool of users looking to download apps. CPAs came down, and companies that had strong UA teams were able to capture a lot of these new users. Thus, this tells me that Playstudios UA team was at least aware of ongoing trends in the mobile app space, and they were able to capitalize by gaining more users during that period of time.
The biggest issue I have is with the "All Other Expenses." I don't know why it's this high (R&D and G&A shouldn't be that high), and Playstudios definitely needs to do some expense cutting here. While this has the most room to cut, it may be the hardest since I'm guessing a lot of that cost is from legacy employees. But if they can get this to around 30% by 2022, I'll be happy.
Playstudios Has No Daily Active Users (DAU) Growth
This is a common issue I see raised on Reddit and I want to address it here. Below is another chart from App Annie, which has DAU estimates.
As you can see, DAU has remained pretty flat for the past 2 years, roughly between 150K and 200K users.
But have you considered that revenues were actually increasing during this time? This means that Playstudios is becoming more efficient at monetizing their current users (getting more money out of older players), or their user acquisition team is targeting more profitable users.
And this is just how the game is played in the mobile apps world.
Users will eventually get sick of a game and stop playing. Not many games can count on users organically finding their game, and continuing to play indefinitely. To maintain a certain DAU, companies generally have to spend money on UA to maintain that user base. It becomes a business where you are calculating how much you are spending on UA, and whether the LTV and retention are good enough that you can make money in the long run from those users. You can think of it as an ROI on your marketing spend.
And this is especially true for mobile game apps. If it were a social app, then yes, something like the network effect can come into play, and UA spend would be much lower. But for Playstudios, maintaining a steady DAU is actually a sign that their UA team knows what they're doing, and they're able to maintain a profitable and highly efficient business. It's actually a positive that they can maintain their DAU, and even INCREASE their revenues during that period.
End Game?
I don't actually know how this will end up. I don't give price targets cause I have no idea how the markets will value this company. But I can provide a few data points so that you can make your own decisions.
From a multiples standpoint, Playstudios is cheap on a revenue multiple basis compared to Playtika, and is about the same from an EBITDA multiple basis.
I personally don't think that Playstudios is a play that's going to 5X. Hell, even 3X I think will be a stretch. But, they do have a loyalty program that will help lower their UA costs, and extend the lifespan of their users. And they are moving into more types of games to diversify their revenue source.
The reason I like this play is because I think the downside is heavily limited. The lifespan of casino slots players are so long, and the revenues are pretty stable (even growing), that there isn't an immediate risk that revenues will all of a sudden drop 30%, as is the case with lots of other mobile game companies. Add on top of this the potential for new revenue growth drivers from Bingo and RPG games, and the potential for margin expansion, that this is an easy 30-50% upside from current prices with almost minimal downside.
One last minor bit, is that I'm sure lots of people missed out on the hype surrounding Draftkings and Skillz, and I'm sure there are some retail investors that will look for any type of casino / mobile gaming / gambling deals, and may jump on this as well. My feeling is that there is also a potential upside from the hype or FOMO factor.
Anyway, this is my analysis on Playstudios / ACAC, hope you guys enjoy.
Disclaimer: I am not a financial advisor. These are my personal views and analysis on Playstudios. Please do your own due diligence.
Disclosure: I own 400 shares of ACAC.

I've been trying to find if the arcade/ticketing version of Deal or No Deal exists in rom/emulator form. Thus far, I've only dug up the portable versions, the Wii version, and the casino/slots version that's UK based?
If anyone has any leads if this is available, I'd very much appreciate it. Thank you!
Game in question: https://youtu.be/41AvdIN7f3M

Hi I recently downloaded the mod menu and all is working fine however when i try to rig the casino slot machines it doesn't work and I cant increase daily limit or get the lucky wheel prize. Any one know why?

Part one: Carrie Santino
In P18, Cooper stops at Judy's diner in Odessa, TX. He cops an attitude to the waitress when she offers him coffee. This is similar to P11 when Candie is pouring coffee for Bradley, and Rodney shoots her a look. Mitchums in P11, visuals connections to the couple at the diner in P18. At the diner, Cooper got Carrie's address and picked her up to take her to the Palmer house.
In P11, Cooper did dine with the Mitchums, at Santino’s restaurant. The lamps and lighting are similar to the Log Lady's (LL) place. Margaret offered coffee and pie to Hawk in P2, who was out and about in the woods following some lead that the LL also knew about. At Santino’s, Cooper chowed down on pie and had a coffee. This could be seen as a version of the LL's place, coinciding with a storyline where Hawk went to Margaret's that night, in that P2 pocket reality. Hawk in P12, like Cooper in P18, was also at the front door of the Palmer house (where Sarah had a bad attitude). Let's construct an alt version of the P18 scenario where Hawk in place of Cooper gets the address of a 'Carrie Santino' (her name has no ring to it, so she has no phone), linked to the LL and another characters, and goes to her place where he’s invited in.
In P1, the LL called Hawk with a hint about Cooper, which had something to do with his heritage. This is brought up again in P4, when sarcastic Chad entered the conference room (note: the actor who plays Chad is Italian). In P18, the dead man on the chair is linked to Chad - Chad said "right between the.." and then got knocked out from the cell door that hit him in the forehead, and the fella in the chair has a bullet hole in the same spot. This Carrie Santino might have a son who is a version of Chad, who sits on a chair when Hawk arrives (P7, after being let it: "let's sit down and have a nice chat/Chad"; P1 trio of fellas in chairs/seats).
In P7, after Hawk finds the diary pages in the bathroom (where Chad had seen him), he reports his findings to Frank. Hawk's ambiguous dialogue leaves open the possibility of multiple characters who could have said something - "She said that these words from Annie came to her in a dream" (what Laura 'said' in her diary), "This thing she said...the good Dale is in the lodge and can't come out" (what Annie said to Laura in her dream), and in P4 "That's what she said" (about what the LL said to Hawk on the phone). In one possibility, Hawk went to a Carrie Santino's place to find something out and reported back to Frank with something that she said.
In P4, Bobby mentioned that his mother told him that Cooper had stopped by the house the day before his father died, and shortly before Cooper skipped town. Chad had just left the conference room, a split second before Bobby entered (as if they aren't meant to appear in the same shot/world). The storyline with Betty Briggs and her son also fits into this Carrie Santino framework (with Chad and Bobby blending together), so that Betty takes the role of Carrie in P9. The trio of fellas went to her place and she said that years ago her husband Garland knew they would come to ask about Cooper and she was to give them the tube. So this Carrie Santino’s husband would also have been dead and would have known Cooper in the past. The LL's husband was named 'Sam' (who also died in a fire like Garland). Sam Stanley (SS; like ‘Sam Santino’) was a character in FWWM, Chet's sidekick on the Teresa Banks investigation, who randomly was estimating the value of things in Dear Meadow.
So a version of Cooper (or Chet) was missing in this pocket reality and Hawk went to a Carrie Santino's place, who had a son, and a husband (Sam?) that died years ago (parallel to Garland), because this Cooper or Chet had allegedly seen the husband shortly he disappeared or skipped town. Hawk then got some information from this Carrie (and maybe he found something else in the home, parallel to the P6 scenario in the bathroom where Chad/the son saw him, as well as the 'tube' scenario) and reported back to his boss. Since Cooper is on Albert and Gordon's team, Albert would seem to be involved in this framework, such that it could be blend of Hawk and Albert who went to this Carrie’s.
In FWWM, Sam Stanley was appraising the value of things around the station, morgue, diner etc in Dear Meadow. Cooper in S1 discussed purchasing property in town. This Sam may have been a real estate agent or appraiser, who went with Cooper to a house he wanted to purchase, and then Cooper went alone and vanished (along with the house and the home owner? parallel to Chet in FWWM and the trailer, which was linked to the Chalfonts). In P11 at Santinos, the old casino slot lady talked about getting a house and her son Denver back in her life. She may be parallel to old Mrs Chalfont whose house Dale found himself in with Laura in the FWWM dream sequence. If the casino lady's son is parallel to Chad, they might be another version of 'Carrie Santino' and son, which would make the story fold in on itself – such that, Cooper went to see the house years back, he vanished (along with the house and owner), then Hawk/Albert went to investigate and saw the wife of the man Cooper was last seen with, which would in a sense repeat the scenario if they were parallel to the Chalfonts. The theme of a repeated investigation (and home owners before home owners) is prevalent in the story.
[In Nolan's Memento, Carrie-Ann Moss and Joe Pantaliano are two characters that take advantage of Lenny Shelby’s condition (short term memory loss). MrC in P2 and P13 remind me of a character with a memory condition, going around in circles and being manipulated (and mocked) by Ray and Darya. It backfired on ‘Teddy’ in Memento and Lenny killed him. Ray and Darya’s deaths might be parallel to those two Memento characters. Moss and Pantaliano also had small roles in the Matrix. In S1E4, Albert comes to the station with two men that looked like Matrix agents. Albert cops an attitude with Lucy and Harry. Albert was said to be very skilled at what he did, he carries a case around in S3 and Ferrer is of Hispanic background. Albert may be a stand-in for skilled guitarist Carols Santana. Blend together 3 names – Santana, Carrie and Pantaliano and you can get: Carrie Santino. In S1, Albert said he had a lot of cutting and pasting to do with Laura’s corpse, but he was met with interference from Dr. H and company. In S3, Ruth and Garland are sort-of combined into one body on the bed. Perhaps it was some Albert (Santana’s) duty to cut (Garland’s man parts) and paste together Ruth and Garland to make a ‘Carrie Santino’ but we saw the unfinished version].
Part 2: Dale and Judy in a can
In Ferris Bueller's Day Off, the sister ‘Jeanie’ had a bad attitude (until she met Charlie Sheen's character). Here's the scene: Ferris Buller scene
In P7, Dr. Hayward mentioned a Mrs. Mueller to Frank, some woman who used Skype, and that he didn't need to get out of this chair to diagnose her. Frank's next scene was with Mrs. Briggs, who was on her computer, and a chair (Garland’s) is central to the scene. There's also a character named Buella who parallels Diane (robes, hairstyle). Switching letters in Mueller and Buella, you can get a Mrs. Bueller.
In P14, Diane says that she has a half-sister Jane, nicknamed 'Janey-E.' The first 'e' in Jeanie (Ferris's sister) could be moved to the end so it's 'Janie E' pronounced the same way as 'Janey-E.' Diane also said in P14 - "I don't want to talk about that night," a possible echo of Phillip's line about not talking about Judy. In the FBI’s hotel room, Diane is shot in P16 and right after that (P17) Gordon finally talks about Judy. So there's something to do with Judy around Diane and her half -sister.
Playing around with letters:
'Diane' & 'Jade' <-- 'Jeanie' & 'Dad'. In place of Jeanie sitting next to Charlie, imagine Jeanie sitting next to her dad (Mr. Bueller), or flip to the other side, Diane sitting next to Jade. Jade is a prostitute and Diane acts like one (one her characters in IE was a street hooker), so it's not hard to imagine them sitting together at some station in a cross-over world.
[Dad: When is 'dad' a character? In P5, Doris stormed into Hawk's office and yelled at Frank about her dad's car problems. Right after Doris slammed the door on her way out, Janey-E exited through her front door. Doris and Janey-E are both blonde, bossy housewives. Bushnell is around Janey-E a few times (notably at the station in P9 where Janey-E and Cooper sit), so if the characters/storylines are shuffled, Jane's dad could be represented by Bushnell in the story, a degree of separation from 'Jeanie & Dad']
In the above scenario, where two sit with a receptionist behind them in the background, if Lucy is that receptionist it could also be: 'Jane' & 'Dad' & 'Lucy' -- 'Judy' & 'Dale' & 'can.'
‘Can?’ In P16, Sonny Jim drinks soda from a cup. Just before Cooper wakes up, Janey-E takes him to the “little boys’” room. If there's a version with a can in place of a cup, Sonny Jim could be a little girl who was taken to the girls' room to pee. Relevance?
In P5, Dale goes to work at Lucky 7 insurance, he meets Phil Bisby and on the elevator ride up Phil presses the button to the 7th floor and says "7 Up." Later, Dale has to urinate and Rhoda takes him to the ladies' room. Let's say that Dale was inside or associated with a can of 7 Up, 'with' Judy (‘Mary’ in the elevator could be a stand-in for her). This can of 7 Up (link to ‘Lucky 7’) could be the can that some little girl was drinking out of in place of Sonny Jim in P16. When it was time for him to go out ("you can go out now") he'd be sucked up - maybe into Dale in the coma (his consciousness) or peed out - the swirl of the toilet may be like the vortex in P11 to the Convenience Store complex stairs, where Gerard later passes with Dale; the man urinating in P13 is credited as “Man in urinal”, is that linked to Gordon P11?)
In the P5 scene where Rhoda helps Dougie to the ladies' room, there are two views - one where she carries a large white key tag (no case files visible), and one where she doesn't have the large white key tag. In the latter, there's a brunette receptionist on a red chair (vs. the blonde in beige earlier) and we see the stack of case files. It follows that in the storyline in which there are no case files, Dale was with Judy in the can and then woke up at the hospital corresponding to when Sonny Jim peed. In the other version, with the case files, the Lucky 7 storyline continues into P6. [If Dale goes out, maybe Judy stays inside the can (related? 'waiting for someone' & can), represented by American Girl remaining in the room after Cooper leaves. Naido was also in that room. If some plot elements are rearranged, let's say Naido/Judy pulls the lever, Cooper falls out into non-Existence ('not Janey-E'?), Naido shifts to Lucy, back at the station with 'Jane' & 'Dad' sitting on the sofa, and thus Dale ceases to exist].
Putting more things together & summing up: In S1, Albert with a cocky attitude came to the station to do tests on Laura’s corpse and interacted with Lucy at the front desk (the trio may be a stand-in for a Carrie Santino, and/or on the flip side the scenario could be Hawk coming to get an address of this Carrie, to ask her about Cooper). Later in S1, Albert wanted Cooper to sign a complaint form after he was clocked by Harry, but Cooper declined and out of the blue told ‘Diane’ he wanted to look into purchasing property in town. Back to Lucy – if elements are shifted and this Lucy was drinking from a can of 7-UP (‘Lucy’ an alternative to 'Lucky' in Lucky 7, which would replace the hospital scenario as well) when this Albert or Hawk came in looking for the address of ‘Carrie Santino' and this Lucy goes to pee and flushes the toilet, a dimensional portal might open up, and the scene might shift to her as the receptionist and ‘Jane & Dad’ sitting together (and Dale not existing)? Correspondingly, the vortex might appear at the Chalfont house [and/or in Carrie’s, and suck up this Albert/Hawk (ceiling fan P12 = vortex stand-in; Palmer house P17 linked to the sky vortex), so that Albert/Hawk gets taken up by the same wormhole or whatever that made Cooper disappear] (this would also be linked to Hawk's P2 trip to the red room portal where Hawk and Cooper potentially crossed paths; Mrs Chalfont's house is also linked to the red room). Something like that! Needs work but elements are in place. [Also, in P3 there was a car crash after Cooper got sucked out of the purple place - maybe the story resets around these events so that Cooper crashes his car on the way back from seeing Sam/Garland (and Albert/Hawk and Gordon/Frank's memories reset, like in P14), and the team gets news in P3 and goes to see him in P4 and on and on..]

How has this been allowed to go on for so long? It's indisputable that lootboxes represent a form of gambling. They have been injected into an industry that is dominated by under 18s and is exploiting them. They generate '£23bn a year and rising' [1]. Is this the reason the UK government is working at a snail's pace to confront this problem?
The governments response to the Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Select Committee's recommendation that, 'loot boxes that contain the element of chance should not be sold to children playing games, and instead in-game credits should be earned through rewards won through playing the games' stinks of indifference and of a will to drag this out as long as possible. They replied, 'the government believes the approach to protecting young people and vulnerable people - and any relevant regulation - should be based on evidence' and 'the government stands ready to take action should the outcomes of the call for evidence support taking a new approach to ensure users, and particularly young people, are protected' [2]. Despite this the response mentions two further reports from the Children’s Commissioner and the Royal Society for Public Health which 'made some similar recommendations to the Select Committee about loot boxes.' So why is there a delay? The Netherlands and Belgium have passed legislation restricting lootboxes so why haven't we?
EA's Fifa Ultimate Team is evidence enough of this abhorrent misconduct. Fifa is PEGI 3 rated and the Ultimate Team game mode allows you to buy packs of football players in a fashion which all too much resembles a casino slot machine: bright colours, confetti, anticipation, easy purchase and calculated reward. These elements capture a child's attention, subdue reason and feed them the vicious cycle of gambling. It's deplorable and so morally alien to me that it genuinely turns my stomach.
We must speak up about this gross injustice. We must hold the government to account and ensure that they prioritise children's well-being over their neoliberalist tendencies.
References:
[1] - https://www.theguardian.com/games/2020/jun/07/uk-could-class-loot-boxes-as-gambling-to-protect-children
[2] - https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/890734/CCS207_CCS0520664408-001_Gov_Resp_DCMS_Committee_Report_CP_241_Web_Accessible__1___1_.pdf

Everything loads when i am in the game. The menu shows up but when i try to do something for example rig casino slots or add rp it wont even work. Does anyone know why?

Just curious to how others are fairing these days. I feel like in the recent weeks, its been the same cycle of offers. Casino slots, Chime and some subscription for a meal in a box type setup.(home chef, blue apron) Others notice this as well? And what have people done with some of the slim pickens? I feel like over the past Summer there were much better offers. At least more in abundance.
Happy swaggin

Looking for some feedback from the community. Unofficially, this sub has been geared towards conventional/traditional gambling methods, e.g. casino, slots, lottery, cards. Sports betting, online gambling, and perhaps others have been dissuaded and redirected to more appropriate subs.
Do you think this should continue?
(more polls may follow depending on the results)
View Poll

Hi, I got an offer for 4500 SB for reaching a certain level in 'Huuuuge Casino' but noticed that it's by the same developer as 'Billionaire Casino Slots' with the same requirements and same rewards and the games are exactly the same too. I wanted to know if I anyone here has done both and if I complete the Huuuge Casino offer if I have already completed the Billionare Casino offer.
Thanks!

Gain.gg is a microtask website which has surveys, sign up offers and app install similar to Swagbucks but it pays via cryptocurrency (I cash out in LiteCoin and send to Celsius). There are some really easy points to be made as shown. 1000 points is worth 1 dollar. In the last month I have done the following offers with very little effort. I usually do them on the way to or from work or while watching TV in the evening. Most didn't take me long, it is waiting for things to refresh allowing you to play which takes the time. Surveys and other tasks pay well but this is some of what I have done in the last month which I recommend you copy:
Board Kings (Ad gate) - 13,000 coins - Took me around 10 days to do this one. Is actually quite a fun game as well
Coin Master (Adgem) - 2700 coins - Couple of days but really really easy.
Merge defence (Ayet studios) - 1890 coins - Again couple of days
Billionarie Casino Slot (Ayet studios) - 10,125 - Couple of days but I got lucky with a jackpot win which gave loads of coins
Star slots - 7315 - Offer Torro - About a week
War and magic - 3240 - Adgem - Instant but had to spend 99p to get this but I had credits from GoogleRewards
Wizard of oz slots - 1950 - Offer Toro - Did this in one go
Pop slots - 2700 - Adgem - About 5 days
Club Vegas - Adgem - 3780 - About 5 days
Rise of Kingdom: Lost crusade - 18600 - Instant but had to spend £9.99 but again I had GoogleRewards to use
Bingo pop - 3510 - Adgem - About 5 days
If you did all the above you would earn 68810 coins approx £50. Minus £11 if you don't have Googleplay rewards and you still have £39. If you complete surveys and collect daily rewards this will of course be higher. If you sign up with my link you get 100 points to start you off.
Ref: https://gain.gg/wansell 100 Free coins to get you going. Non-Ref https://gain.gg

How to make money ez using Kiddions 1. Enter Casino 2. Open menu >> Online services >> Casino settings >> Rig casino slots >>> Play the casino slots that yields you the highest amount of reward (play the slots 2-3 times, so you end up with 5 to 7.5 million) 3. Buy a bunker 4. Open menu >> Online services >> Bunker settings >> Remove Supply Delay >> Order supplies >> Trigger production >> Set bunker delivery to less than 2 million (2 million doesn't work for me, so I lower it down to 600K and it automatically gives me 1.2 million) >> Press num 5 5. Once you have enough money, buy an arcade and buy the master terminal for it. Using master terminal to do the bunker supply and sell missions is a lot more convenient imo
Alternative but not so ez money making method 1. Open menu >> Tunables >> Max mission payout set it to 100k 2. Play Solo rockstar created jobs
Alternatively, you could do the Cayo Perico Heist 1. Open UC >> look up Stattext Maker >> open the web app >> set your loots, weapons, approach, etc >> download the .txt file >> open GTAHax while GTAO is running >> click on import file at the bottom of GTAHax (make sure ur stat.txt file and GTAHax are in the same folder)
I recommend using only the bunker,s olo missions or cayo perico method to earn money. Although the casino method is safe, it's still not worth the risk. The cayo perico may take you more time to earn the same amount of money as the casino method, but it's a lot lot lot more safer
For RP and leveling up 1. Open menu >> Tunables >> RP multiplier (the multiplier depends on the job you are doing) >> do any heist, solo rockstar mission or bunker supply mission
Hope this helps for all the new kiddions users. Stay safe and have fun modding.

The Home of Fame and Fortune
Heading for the win and seeking a trusted online casino? King Johnnie is in the gambling Hall of Fame with a variety of exceptional gaming titles delivered by leading software providers. It differs from tons of other similar websites offering the same gaming and bonus opportunities. At King Johnnie Casino, you will understand how easy it can be to get up to $6,000 cash-free plus up to 200 spins at zero cost. It is your lucky chance to start an award-winning gambling career with multiple promotion opportunities and generous offers.
The website strikes users with a unique and capturing design. Each detail was made to make players feel comfortable and relaxed. Despite the fact it is a relatively new project, King Johnnie has already made a name for itself as a trusted and honest gambling service provider. It ensures quick cash withdrawal using multiple payment options with games delivered by some of the most respected software providers in the industry.
Feel like taking a chance and try your luck here? Make sure you claim a generous welcome and other bonuses to get free cash on not only the first but also second, third, or even tenth deposit. VIP players will appreciate additional perks and features while newbies can count on professional support, a clear wagering policy, and lots of other great options delivered by King Johnnie Casino out of the box.
https://casinokingjohnnie.com/

Top-Rated Casino Games for all Tastes

Either you are a beginner with a dedication to classic casino slots or an experienced gourmet searching for up-to-date emulators with exceptional graphics, King Johnnie has a wide selection of games to offer. They represent some of the most iconic and well-known titles such as Gold Digger, Sun of Egypt, and King of Kings to some more exotic and exclusive options including Golden Vein, Wombaroo, and others.
Players will have a chance to choose from several slot categories. They are as follows:
- Traditional casino games such as roulette and baccarat.
- Popular card games including Black Jack, poker, etc.
- Modern slot machines with 3D graphics, amazing visuals, and sound effects.
- Classic slots with progressive jackpots.
- Additional options in the form of scratch cards, sports betting, and so on.
Each game refers to a particular genre. Here we have traditional Egypt-related games in addition to emulators with popular cartoon and movie characters. Choose the one you like and try it free at no cost. A great way to benefit from risk-free gaming and work out an effective strategy.

Most Respected Software Developers

Do you know what makes a casino game special? It is not only about gameplay, theme, or graphics, It is about simplicity and the maximum available payout percentage. King Johnnie collaborates with some of the most trusted and top-rated software providers. They include such legendary titles as BetSoft, Evolution Gaming, QuickSpin, IGT, and many other recognizable companies.
Advanced technologies ensure 100% safe gaming in addition to high odds of winning the big prize. All slots are available in a flash version. You may try them free without depositing real money. All games are sorted by the software provider. Choose the one from the list and select the slot you like with a click.

İnternette yer alan bahis sitelerinin yanı sıra bedava bonuslar alarak slot oynayabileceğiniz de bir çok site vardır. Bonus çevrim kurallarına uygun şartları yerine getirdiğinizde sitelerde ki bonuslarınızı kullanarak kazanç elde etmeniz mümkündür. Bedava Casino Slot Oyunları oynayabileceğiniz sitelere giriş sistemi sağladığımız sitemizi ziyaret edebilirsiniz.

At vegasslot.org you can check the detailed information and learn more about online casino slots and Vegas slots as-well. We have all type of slots like: Fruit Machines, 3D slots, Online Casino Slots and many more.